Jan 05 2009

The Leading Characteristics of Organizational Leaders: Leading as a Symbol of Hope

Published by Administrator under All ILC Categories

One of my favorite authors on leadership is Peter G. Northouse. I’m currently reviewing his book, Introduction to Leadership: Concepts and Practice, for a scholarly leadership journal. Northouse has always been a favorite of mine because of his clarity on the theories and practices of leadership. Furthermore, Northouse, in his latest book, emphasizes early-on the critical role character plays in the ability to lead successfully. People more readily follow leaders who are competent. Competence builds trust in a way that no other attribute can. When followers trust their leaders, they often offer their best efforts and support in return. After identifying important historical leaders who have “led well,” Northouse makes this statement, “All are visionary, strong willed, diligent, and inspirational. As purpose-driven leaders, they are role models and symbols of hope’ (Northouse, p. 19, 2009).

Leading as a symbol of hope is critical especially now given the current economic crises which is bleeding through to most social and familial structures and communities. I believe it is crucial, if you are a leader in a position of influence and authority, to ensure that you lead in a way that not only brings results within the organization but which also cultivates hope in others. Leaders, when they are transformational, are de facto role models and encouragers which, as we know, are incredibly valuable by-products of effectiveness and competency.

Best,

Jeffrey

No responses yet

Dec 22 2008

A Reflection on Christmas and the Mind and Heart of the Leader

Published by Administrator under All ILC Categories

In the midst of the sights, colors, and emotions of this Christmas season, my thoughts are often focused upon those who have encountered the very turbulent waters of unemployment resulting from involuntary job loss. The loss of a job or, more importantly, the loss of an opportunity to labor and contribute toward a worthy goal, is devastating. With the precipitous rise of national unemployment figures, I can only imagine the tens of thousands of people this season who anguish over a fundamental loss of meaning as well as the fear that comes from the specter of economic privation. For these, what is meant to be a meaningful season is full of what appears to be meaninglessness. Yet it is here, in this place, that new meaning…a “deeper magic” to use C. S. Lewis’ expression…can be discovered.

Much of what I have read about the emergence of meaning comes from literature that focuses on losses. Viktor Frankl, Richard Tedeschi, Ronnie Janoff-Bulman, and Salvador Maddi are four scholars who make it very clear that there is much to be gained from encountering losses…even those which are particularly devastating. Losses have a stripping effect. They can easily and quickly dismantle our psychological schemas and spiritual scaffolding or belief systems. When we are caught in the throws of unrelenting struggle and hardship, we can become more existentially aware, meaning, we can have a heightened sense of awareness of who we are, why we are here, and the contribution we are to leave with others. Getting clear on these questions is critical to the type of life we desire to live. When we have neglected answering these questions or when we try to satisfy our deepest yearnings and longings with all things transcient, we are in trouble when our life is stripped bare by suffering.

I’ve always felt the season of Advent and the celebration of the birth of Jesus is about answering the most critical existential questions of life. I have encountered and answered these questions in the following ways. Who am I? A person of infinite value and worth. Not because I say it is so but because Another has declared it. Why am I here? To give and receive love and to bring value and communicate esteem to others. What is my purpose and contribution? To encourage others to lead well, to live authentically, and to leave an imprint on the world that is redemptive and restorative.

May your blessings as well as your losses make you stronger, clearer, and more compassionate. Perhaps the One who comes to us in this season will open our mind and heart to the power of both love and suffering.

“For he is our childhood’s pattern, day by day like us he grew,
He was little, weak and helpless, tears and smiles like us he knew:
And he feeleth for our sadness, and he shareth in our gladness.”

From “Once in Royal David’s City” arr. Jeffrey Smith (b. 1960)

No responses yet

Dec 11 2008

Resilience and Well-Being: What is it? Why is it important? How do we teach it to our students? Part 3

The good news is that the work of Carol Ryff (1989) on well-being has proven to be a promising resource that offers excellent insight into the problem. Ryff takes an approach that excites me as an instructor. Ryff and Singer (2003) observe that while there is much to be learned about fostering and facilitating resilience, public education and community intervention programs should capitalize upon opportunities that employ the tools that promote resilience. We need to begin to marshall our best resources around this issue - especially academic, professional and technical knowledge, coupled with an understanding of how to apply the cognitive and behavioral tools that promote and embed resilience. As instructors we have a responsibility to give our students their best shot at success. The question is, “How do we make that happen?”

A Strategy for Promoting Resilience with Adult Learners

While instructors can pick and choose among different resources to construct a resilience curriculum, they may well be frustrated by the lack of coherence and theoretical alignment of this approach. It is tough to piecemeal such a vital teaching construct as resilience. I believe I can offer some helpful insight drawn from my own sometimes frustrating experience.

I consulted with Dr. Carol D. Ryff (see the aforementioned and references) sometime ago asking her the question, “What key research would you suggest I review that focuses on the way that adults learn resilience?” Dr. Ryff’s response to me was exactly what I was looking for. She believes that the research on promoting well-being can be closely linked to promoting resilience. After consulting with the research Ryff had referenced (Fava & Cuini, 2003; Fava, Ruini, Rafanelli, Finos, Conti, & Grandi, 2004) and additional resources that were referenced in other related research (Ryff, 1989a; Ryff, 1989b), I designed a curriculum utilizing content from these sources and focused the teaching and discussion on the critical themes of well-being as indicators of resilience. These themes, drawn from Ryff’s work (1989) on well-being were: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life and personal growth.

Embedding Resilience within the Conversation About Strengths

At Olympic College we run a two-day, two-credit course called Improving Human Effectiveness which utilizes the Gallup Institutes’ resources on strengths. I incorporated into this course the curriculum on well-being. Day one, entitled Discovering your Strengths: Getting Clear On What You Bring To the World, focuses on introducing students to the concept of strengths building. We interpret the Strengths Assessment, connect strengths to academic and career planning, and then apply a strengths strategy within organizational settings. Day two, entitled Building a Strong Life: Creating an Environment Where Your Strengths Can Flourish, focuses on the larger life-context in which the students can successfully live-into their strengths. The fundamental rationale in this approach is that, while it is important to identify and operationalize your strengths or “signature themes,” it is equally important to nurture the personal practices that foster resilience and to intentionally create larger supportive networks. Only then can a person withstand the stiff resistance and intimidating challenges that consistently occur and often undermine the energy needed to apply a strengths strategy in and out of the workplace.

Sample Schedule of the Improving Human Effectiveness Course

Day 1: Discovering Your Strengths: Getting Clear On What You Bring To the World
1. Welcome, Purpose, Agenda, and Introductions
2. Introduction to Strengths and Positive Psychology
3. Trombone Player Wanted segment 1: So What’s Stopping You from Discovering Your Strengths?
3.1. Exercise and Discussion on Peak Performances
4. Trombone Player Wanted segment 2: Do You Know What Your Strengths Are?
4.1. Understanding How Strengths Work: Talents, Skills, and Knowledge
5. Trombone Player Wanted segment 3: How Can You Make The Most Out Of Your Strengths?
5.1. Designing Your Academic and Career Strategy With Your Strengths In Mind
6. Trombone Player Wanted segment 4: How Do You Cut Out The Weaknesses?
6.1. Identifying the Obstacles Of Living Into Your Strengths
7. Trombone Player Wanted segment 5: Why Is It So Hard To Talk About This?
7.1. Maximizing Your Strengths in the Organization and Work Setting
8. Trombone Player Wanted segment 6: Why Can’t This Last Forever?
9. Concluding Thoughts

Day 2: Building a Strong Life: Creating an Environment Where Your Strengths Can Flourish

1. Why Strengths Are Only Part of the Equation of Succeeding Personally and Professionally
1.1. Reflection: Identify Your Greatest Barriers to Your Personal and Professional Growth.
2. Building Well-Being and Resilience Into Your Life: The Key to Living Into Your Strengths
3. The Five Critical Factors that Promote Resilience
3.1. Dispositional Optimism
3.2. Healthy Environments Which Foster Empowering Habits and Entrepreneurial (possibility) Thinking
3.3. Supportive Champions and Advocates Who Promote Coping and Self-Disclosure
3.4. Creating Social Capital
3.5. Identifying Reflective Physical Environments
4. The Six Dimensions that Promote Personal Well-Being
4.1. Self-Acceptance
4.2. Positive Relations With Others
4.3. Autonomy
4.4. Environmental Mastery
4.5. Purpose in Life
4.6. Personal Growth
5. Commitment and Conclusion

Summary

There is much more work to be done in the area of promoting an understanding of well-being and resilience with the students in our community colleges. The unique mission of the community college creates the kind of learning environment where academic learning can be strategically connected with the insight needed to survive and excel in an increasingly difficult world. To teach in this environment, working with these students, toward these critical ends is both a responsibility and a privilege!

No responses yet

Dec 04 2008

Resilience and Well-Being: What is it? Why is it important? How do we teach it to our students? Part 2

Understanding and Experiencing Resilience

Resilience is defined as a dynamic process encompassing positive adaptation within the context of significant adversity (Luther, Cochiti & Becker, 2000). Positive adaptation means the ability to adjust or respond to adversity in such a way that emotional and cognitive equilibrium is maintained. Instead of being completely derailed or paralyzed by unanticipated and difficult circumstances, one is able to understand and rally the resources necessary to move through crises successfully. My own experience with significant adversity has convinced me that adapting to sudden and unexpected setbacks does not come naturally for most adults, especially those adults who have not learned coping skills during critical developmental periods such as childhood and adolescence. It must be learned and incorporated into one’s approach to daily living. The question then becomes, “How do adults learn resilience?”

Research on Adults and Resilience (macrolevel domains)

The research on resilience formally began by studying resilient children, specifically, how children who were subjected to adverse family situations (such as poverty, uneducated parents, mental illness, alcoholism and divorce) managed to negotiate these significant barriers and emerge as successful adults (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1998). This line of research which focused on the benefits of adversity signaled a fundamental shift in developmental psychopathology from a preoccupation on deficits or pathology to a focus on strengths (Lepore & Revenson, 2006). In her landmark longitudinal study, Werner (1989) showed evidence that, while a majority of children who experienced extremely difficult environments developed behavioral and learning problems, a full third matured into healthy and well-adjusted adults. The characteristics which created this capacity to move through adversity included strong social skills, building on successive coping successes, a stronger sense of self-efficacy and self-esteem (Rutter, 1987; Garmezy, 1985). In other words, as some children learned to manage adversity, they tended to become more confident and skilled at continuing the practice into adulthood.

Lepore and Revenson’s (2006) evaluation is very helpful in further understanding what facilitates resilience in adults. They identify five domains or research trends that figure prominently in resiliency. The first domain is dispositional optimism which is defined as “the stable, generalized expectancy or belief that one will experience good things in life and that future outcomes will be positive” (p. 31). Dispositional optimism is expressed in the following ways: the willingness to try harder, the ability to reframe negative experiences in more positive ways, the tendency to discover benefits in adversity and to remind oneself of those benefits (Affleck, 1999), knowing when to jettison unattainable goals or even worldviews that no longer apply and look for new ones and a strong social network of relationships providing enhanced social resources (Lepore & Revenson).

The second domain is resilience-promoting environments or how key social influences surrounding the individual promote resilience. Lepore and Revenson (2006) suggest three environmental qualities that advance the development of resilience: environments that encourage physical and mental health; environments that champion normative development; and environments that cultivate social cohesion and social capital. I have found evidence aplenty that underscores Lepore and Revenson’s emphasis on the importance of environment. Many students, while seeming to possess the necessary drive to perform well academically, are often surrounded by toxic and acrid environments which can dismantle academic focus and vocational aspiration. This should serve to remind those of us who teach that many factors beyond the classroom may influence, even mitigate against, a student’s academic performance.

The third domain is safe social environments that promote coping. Lepore and Revenson (2006) note that individuals who have access to others with whom they can self-disclose are more resilient than those who do not. This accessibility to supportive others and subsequent self-disclosure builds a strong social network in which the individual can be encouraged, explore alternatives for action and alleviate emotional distress. When students have champions and supportive advocates, as opposed to consistent interaction with people who are indifferent or even hostile to their success, they stand a far greater chance of flourishing in and beyond the classroom.

The fourth domain is social capital or the presence of institutional structures rooted and grounded in the community which are available to resource the individual (Lepore & Revenson, 2006). Religious institutions, community organizations, strong schools, cohesive neighborhoods, available health care and a responsive social service network can provide supportive and timely resources to the individual facing life’s turbulence. When the resources are visible and accessible within a community, they foster the development of resiliency by offering dynamic and timely “social connections and a synchronization of resources” (Lepore & Revenson, p. 34). For example, for both members and community visitors, religious organizations offer emotional and monetary support, spiritual counsel, relational networks and meaningful connection to outreach or “mission” enterprises, all of which promote a sense of personal significance and worth. Habitat for Humanity is another example where community volunteering connects a person with a worthwhile mission and also with other like-minded individuals. The point here is to understand how meaningful activity strengthens a person’s sense of purpose and value.

The fifth domain is the physical environment. While this domain has not been thoroughly researched, Lepore and Revenson (2006) remark that it holds promise in promoting resilience. I agree. Specifically, natural surroundings which are conducive to self-reflection can be conduits of rejuvenation and restoration. A sanctuary - a safe and generative place to which one can retreat, focus, self-disclose and consider options for personal growth - may foster resilience.

These five domains serve as important factors that can catalyze the emergence of resilience. Based on my experience in the classroom, regardless of whether or not these five domains are in place (and often times they are not), students benefit greatly from simply understanding the potential value of these key factors. It is important to note here however, that the research on how to teach resilience to adults is lacking and inconclusive. The scholarly studies I have reviewed are fundamentally descriptive; they focus only on explaining the characteristics of resilience in children and/or adults as well as the life experiences that lead to the emergence of resilience. In light of this, my concern has been to identify information on resilience and intervention. The question I wish to resolve is: How do we facilitate in adults the acquisition of new tools which hold the potential to break through personal and environmental barriers that sabotage tenacity and slacken the will to succeed?

Best,

Jeffrey

No responses yet

Nov 09 2008

Resilience and Well-Being: What is it? Why is it important? How do we teach it to our students? Part 1

As a professor of organizational leadership and resource management, I sometimes teach students in the areas of leadership development and human effectiveness in organizations. While other courses are offered in the OLRM discipline at Olympic College, the two mentioned above explore in detail the character of the leader and the personal and professional competencies required to succeed within the organization. It has surprised me that most published curriculum tends to virtually ignore the important factor of human resilience in discussions of these concepts. For example, of the texts required for these courses (Daft, 2008; Reece & Brandt, 2008), only 1 page (out of a total of 913 pages) addresses the topic of “welcoming failure” (Daft, pp. 185-186) and “resilience” (Reece & Brandt, pp. 343-344). These exceedingly brief treatments are cursory at best and offer little help in understanding what resilience is or how one becomes resilient. Nowhere in these explanations does the reader discover how to acquire resilience over time, how to learn critical coping skills that empower forward movement in the face of adversity, or why cultivating well-being is a critical component for success in the work environment, as well as life itself. The more I teach and interact with students, the more I realize that finding a way to communicate how an adult learns to be resilient is absolutely crucial to self-esteem and vocational drive.

The paucity of printed information about resilience and well-being is quite ironic, given the fact that we are attempting to facilitate learning for students who aspire to succeed in the complex and often grinding milieu of business organizations. In all of the courses I teach, students seldom understand much about the markers or characteristics of resilience. They may be marginally familiar with the definition of the word resilience but have no grasp of why it is vitally important to survival and success. To my query about the meaning of resilience, classes usually respond that it’s about “bouncing back” from difficult circumstances. Few students understand much more than that. They have no deep awareness that resilience is an experienced or lived phenomenon, that it is the challenging self-movement into and through failure despite overwhelming feelings of desperation, disappointment, and helplessness. Most definitely do not recognize how resilience could significantly impact their current and future lives.

Perhaps due to the condition of our economy and the rising tide of unemployment, coupled with the demographics of Kitsap County, many of the students I encounter seem too fixated on what they have going against them to be able to envision possibilities and opportunities. Perhaps this is true of the students you instruct as well. I often find myself inwardly blanching at the stories of hardship, despondency and indifference and self-engineered failure that have virtually locked-down students from believing in themselves or that they can achieve a better quality of life. I see the struggle in their eyes. I sense hopelessness in their voices. Despite their best efforts and loftiest aspirations, they see themselves making little to no progress in their lives. The headwinds seem too stiff and growing stiffer. The barriers appear insurmountable. And the odds feel increasingly stacked against them. They have come to believe that they lack the talent, the money, the pedigree and the connections that open the right doors for others but not for them.
I want to share with you the approach I have taken to provide a type of “immunization” against the soul-eating disease of negativity that too often derails students. In every course I teach, I build into the curriculum a minimum of one full lecture and discussion on three critical areas that directly address personal and professional growth in the face of adversity. These three related areas are resilience, thriving and posttraumatic growth: resilience addresses how to create an environment that promotes emotional health and a focus on opportunity despite adverse circumstances; thriving addresses how to foster change as a direct result of personal setbacks; posttraumatic growth addresses the positive gains that can emerge from traumatic and devastating events. Significant scholarly research supports the efficacy of all three areas, and my experience confirms the usefulness of these concepts. Thus, I would invite you to discuss with others in your discipline or academic department how students might significantly benefit from exposure to these three concepts. Even a basic foundation in these precepts would give students a compass to better navigate the unexpected vicissitudes of everyday life and professional advancement.

Best,

Jeffrey

No responses yet

Sep 28 2008

Leadership and Resilience

Why do leaders need resilience in order to lead effectively? Because the work of leadership is difficult and often challenging to the point where a leader’s personal resources are exhausted. When exhaustion sets in so often does frustration and despair. If this sense of emptiness becomes a chronic state it can create a sense of defeat and impact-insignificance which then further erodes a leader’s ability to influence organizational vision, people and processes.

If you’re not sure what resilience means, take a moment to ponder this. Ryff and Singer (2003) defined resilience as “the capacity to either maintain or regain multiple aspects of positive psychological functioning in the face of difficult life circumstances or demanding transitions” (p. 185). Ryff and Singer tracked individuals confronting behaviors within the context of “naturally occurring life challenges, such as normative life transitions, critical and unexpected events and chronically occurring difficulties” (p.185). The dominant resilience question that guided the work of Ryff and Singer as they explored behaviors across these contexts was, “who stays well in the face of challenging events” (p. 185). In a similar approach, Carver (1998) defines resilience as denoting “the capacity to recover from a downturn to a former state of relative well being” (p. 247). This “bounce-back” capacity can improve over time as repeated instances of challenging events produce less severe downturns and increasing quicker recoveries (Carver, p. 248). Experience with disruption over time, as Carver views it, actually leaves individuals more capable of repairing the disruption than they were when they first encountered the disrupting event (p. 249). Masten, Best, and Garmezy (1990) define resilience as “the process of, capacity for, or outcome of successful adaptation despite challenging or threatening circumstances.”

These definitions of resilience suggest that, for leaders, you get stronger or more “immunized” against steep downturns the more you actually experience them. Resilience means that you regain your footing and regain your professional balance and equilibrium as you confront the challenges that knock your knees out from under you. Resilience does not mean you are impervious to setbacks. Rather it means you experience the full emotional impact of setbacks and the discouragement that comes along with those setbacks, yet, you work to recover and regain your perspective. Furthermore, the more you slog through the experience of working out of the difficult seasons the more capable you are of dealing with them when they confront you down the road. May this be good news for those leaders who are seeking to catch a glimpse of how to rightly perceive (or cognitivley understand) and recover from the setbacks that come with the territory of responsible leadership.

Best,

Jeff

No responses yet

Jul 31 2008

Leadership and Resilience: Choice or Capacity?

Published by Administrator under All ILC Categories

Were you aware that resilience is a capacity that one possesses rather than a choice that one makes? Resilience as a choice implies that you can choose to be resilient in the face of difficult circumstances or situations…like putting on clothing or choosing an item on a menu. Resilience, so it would seem, is like throwing a light switch from off to on. Well, unfortunately, resilience does not seem to work in this manner. Resilience is a learned behavior, absorbed over time, the result of navigating tough life circumstances and emerging from them as a survivor. Much of the resilience research has focused on children. Children who have survived early childhood traumas, for example, the divorce of parents and subsequent disruption of everyday life, and emerge into adulthood as people who can survive and “find their way through the pain and setbacks of life.”

Yet, I also believe that resilience can be learned as adults but this learning process must be accompanied by very specific events and actions. What I mean is that if you, as an adult, are to learn to be resilient when confronted by intimidating and potentially overwhelming circumstances, you are well-served to take the following actions:

1. Acknowledge the dilemma. Don’t pretend or lie to yourself. See your reality for what it is. This “truth-telling” is the first step in learning to become resilient.

2. Study and understand what exactly is going on. Learn the details, the issues, the facts, and the people that are involved. Don’t magnify how bad things are by overstating what you “think” is happening to you. Find out exactly what the issues are.

3. Surround yourself with people who can see your situation from different perspectives. Here the key is getting other eyes on your situation in addition to your own. When you are “in the soup” you are massively subjective and biased and therefore easily and quickly lose the ability to see unemotionally and objectively. So, choose a small circle of friends whom you trust, whose wisdom you respect, and ask them to coach you and to speak wisdom into your situation. You often find, and research shows that when it comes to resilience, that you can’t make it through the most difficult of life’s circumstances alone.

4. Get the professional help you need in addition to # 3 above. Abrupt and difficult life-events can cause emotional trauma and this emotional impact “can” cause longer-term damage if it is not specifically addressed. Ask around and get the names of community professionals who are respected. Most will have sliding scales that will work with your budget.

5. Be patient….very patient. This process of recovering takes time…not days or weeks but months and perhaps years. Don’t short-circuit this process by succumbing to short-term or quick fixes.

6. Journal, read and write. Cultivate your spirituality. Each of the major spiritual traditions speak powerfully to the value and positive impact that personal setbacks can bring. Each often speak to keeping hold of faith and hope.

7. Keep moving ahead…one step at a time. Don’t quit or give up. Some days the progress is significant while other days it is extremely incremental and perhaps more of a slight retreat. You will have hard days and days of small victories…this is to be expected.

8. Remember…the way forward is the way through.

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

Resilience vs. Posttraumatic Growth for Organizational Leaders

Which is better for leaders who have experienced a significant failure in leadership: Resilience or posttraumatic growth? The reason this question is central is due in large part to the end result of either option. Resilience is often the right choice when a leadership failure or challenge is not catastrophic meaning it does not result in the loss of employment (even though the event does result in emotional bruising and professional embarrassment). Here resilience is about the decision to “make your way back” to a level of efficiency and leadership influence which existed prior to the event. This decision is about determination, perseverance, overcoming the odds, proving your metal and proving other’s wrong. Resilience, when viewed from only a utilitarian perspective, is about self-vindication. It can be characterized by an impatient and irrepressible urge to scratch and claw one’s way back to a position of leadership status and power.

The danger that lies with this understanding and experience of resilience is that little internally changes. By this I mean that while you can regain your footing professionally little in your cognitive and emotional infrastructure changes when, in fact, it may need to change. Why is this significant? Because the rare opportunity that failure provides the leader is to examine the reasons or rationale that gave rise to the action which led to the failure in the first place. This is the where the richness and value of resilience coupled with reflection lay. The reality, however, is that many leaders bypass this critical evaluative opportunity and move right through to the re-establishment and re-stabilization of their positional power. While one’s position and hegemony may be recovered, the risk is high that at some point in the future the failure will be repeated.

Next installment…why leaders can so easily bypass (ignore) the opportunity to reflect and learn from their organizational failures and why this increases the risk of additional leadership failure.

No responses yet

May 28 2008

Posttraumatic Growth for Organizational Leaders

I am beginning a series on Resilience and Posttraumatic growth as it relates to those in positions of organizational leadership, in particular, those who are key decision-makers from senior executives, to mid-level management to those who are just emerging as talented and gifted leaders in their organizations.

This discussion will focus on the meaning of resilience as it applies to leadership under pressure and with high expectations and secondly, the meaning of posttraumatic growth for leaders who have experienced catastrophic job loss leading to a major crises. The question I am raising is this: what does it mean for leaders to “rebound” or “make their way forward into new forms of leadership” after dealing with a major career derailment and setback?

Any review of the literature available today in major book retailers will tell you that, with very few exceptions, business leaders face daunting expectations. Not only are decision-makers under a great deal of pressure, not only are they dealing with significant and often unrealistic expectations both internally and externally, they also have a poverty of resources to turn to when they fail. Failure is a common theme within the ranks of non-profit and for-profit organizational leadership. With very little recourse and no road map to chart their way through exceptionally difficult terrain, these leaders can find it hard to regain their footing and move through the most difficult personal and professional season they will most likely ever face.

In the next post: Understanding the meaning of Resilience and the Nexus with Organizational Leaders.

No responses yet

Apr 28 2008

Part III: The Three Components of Self-Leadership: A Philosophy of (or an apologetic for) Self-Leadership, The Practices of Self-Leadership, The Disciplines of Self-Leadership

The Three Disciplines of Self-Leadership are….

1. Cultivating Inner Personal Meaning

Deepening Self-Awareness

The capacity to be vigilant about and grounded in your own strengths, limitations, uniqueness, history and emerging identity regardless of external pressures to detach from what you know about your deepest truth(s).

Maintaining spiritual moorings

Sustaining a dynamic connection with a spiritual foundation that provides an interpretation or story of your purpose and journey.

Depth Perception of others

The ability to identify and celebrate the deeper value, worth, dignity and longings of others and to contribute toward their growth and personal discovery through service and empowerment.

Commitment to growing forward regardless

The relentless and indomitable pursuit of forward movement into and out of the vicissitudes and vagaries of life .

3. Constructing an engaging Personal Vision

An engaging vision for yourself

A vision that encompasses your passions and dreams, is aligned with your uniqueness and your present realities and invites you to reach, stretch, and extend but not grasp or claim. A great resource to read for an indepth reflection on personal vision and passion is Parker Palmer’s Let Your Life Speak

A courageous vision for your leadership in the organization

Since leadership is fundamentally about relationships of influence, keep clarity about how your exercise of leadership will advance, strengthen and transform the organizations in which you serve. This includes an ongoing professional development plan driven by a strong internal locus of control.

4. Assessing Personal Impact

Living with Humility and abandoning hubris

Remaining open, teachable, malleable, rather than hardened, closed, rigid, and protected.

Learning from rather than resisting seasons of failure

Becoming resilient by allowing life’s failures to dismantle false constructs and illusions and to deepen understanding and wisdom and enlarge the capacity for love and courage.

No responses yet

« Prev - Next »