Understanding and Experiencing Resilience
Resilience is defined as a dynamic process encompassing positive adaptation within the context of significant adversity (Luther, Cochiti & Becker, 2000). Positive adaptation means the ability to adjust or respond to adversity in such a way that emotional and cognitive equilibrium is maintained. Instead of being completely derailed or paralyzed by unanticipated and difficult circumstances, one is able to understand and rally the resources necessary to move through crises successfully. My own experience with significant adversity has convinced me that adapting to sudden and unexpected setbacks does not come naturally for most adults, especially those adults who have not learned coping skills during critical developmental periods such as childhood and adolescence. It must be learned and incorporated into one’s approach to daily living. The question then becomes, “How do adults learn resilience?”
Research on Adults and Resilience (macrolevel domains)
The research on resilience formally began by studying resilient children, specifically, how children who were subjected to adverse family situations (such as poverty, uneducated parents, mental illness, alcoholism and divorce) managed to negotiate these significant barriers and emerge as successful adults (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1998). This line of research which focused on the benefits of adversity signaled a fundamental shift in developmental psychopathology from a preoccupation on deficits or pathology to a focus on strengths (Lepore & Revenson, 2006). In her landmark longitudinal study, Werner (1989) showed evidence that, while a majority of children who experienced extremely difficult environments developed behavioral and learning problems, a full third matured into healthy and well-adjusted adults. The characteristics which created this capacity to move through adversity included strong social skills, building on successive coping successes, a stronger sense of self-efficacy and self-esteem (Rutter, 1987; Garmezy, 1985). In other words, as some children learned to manage adversity, they tended to become more confident and skilled at continuing the practice into adulthood.
Lepore and Revenson’s (2006) evaluation is very helpful in further understanding what facilitates resilience in adults. They identify five domains or research trends that figure prominently in resiliency. The first domain is dispositional optimism which is defined as “the stable, generalized expectancy or belief that one will experience good things in life and that future outcomes will be positive” (p. 31). Dispositional optimism is expressed in the following ways: the willingness to try harder, the ability to reframe negative experiences in more positive ways, the tendency to discover benefits in adversity and to remind oneself of those benefits (Affleck, 1999), knowing when to jettison unattainable goals or even worldviews that no longer apply and look for new ones and a strong social network of relationships providing enhanced social resources (Lepore & Revenson).
The second domain is resilience-promoting environments or how key social influences surrounding the individual promote resilience. Lepore and Revenson (2006) suggest three environmental qualities that advance the development of resilience: environments that encourage physical and mental health; environments that champion normative development; and environments that cultivate social cohesion and social capital. I have found evidence aplenty that underscores Lepore and Revenson’s emphasis on the importance of environment. Many students, while seeming to possess the necessary drive to perform well academically, are often surrounded by toxic and acrid environments which can dismantle academic focus and vocational aspiration. This should serve to remind those of us who teach that many factors beyond the classroom may influence, even mitigate against, a student’s academic performance.
The third domain is safe social environments that promote coping. Lepore and Revenson (2006) note that individuals who have access to others with whom they can self-disclose are more resilient than those who do not. This accessibility to supportive others and subsequent self-disclosure builds a strong social network in which the individual can be encouraged, explore alternatives for action and alleviate emotional distress. When students have champions and supportive advocates, as opposed to consistent interaction with people who are indifferent or even hostile to their success, they stand a far greater chance of flourishing in and beyond the classroom.
The fourth domain is social capital or the presence of institutional structures rooted and grounded in the community which are available to resource the individual (Lepore & Revenson, 2006). Religious institutions, community organizations, strong schools, cohesive neighborhoods, available health care and a responsive social service network can provide supportive and timely resources to the individual facing life’s turbulence. When the resources are visible and accessible within a community, they foster the development of resiliency by offering dynamic and timely “social connections and a synchronization of resources” (Lepore & Revenson, p. 34). For example, for both members and community visitors, religious organizations offer emotional and monetary support, spiritual counsel, relational networks and meaningful connection to outreach or “mission” enterprises, all of which promote a sense of personal significance and worth. Habitat for Humanity is another example where community volunteering connects a person with a worthwhile mission and also with other like-minded individuals. The point here is to understand how meaningful activity strengthens a person’s sense of purpose and value.
The fifth domain is the physical environment. While this domain has not been thoroughly researched, Lepore and Revenson (2006) remark that it holds promise in promoting resilience. I agree. Specifically, natural surroundings which are conducive to self-reflection can be conduits of rejuvenation and restoration. A sanctuary - a safe and generative place to which one can retreat, focus, self-disclose and consider options for personal growth - may foster resilience.
These five domains serve as important factors that can catalyze the emergence of resilience. Based on my experience in the classroom, regardless of whether or not these five domains are in place (and often times they are not), students benefit greatly from simply understanding the potential value of these key factors. It is important to note here however, that the research on how to teach resilience to adults is lacking and inconclusive. The scholarly studies I have reviewed are fundamentally descriptive; they focus only on explaining the characteristics of resilience in children and/or adults as well as the life experiences that lead to the emergence of resilience. In light of this, my concern has been to identify information on resilience and intervention. The question I wish to resolve is: How do we facilitate in adults the acquisition of new tools which hold the potential to break through personal and environmental barriers that sabotage tenacity and slacken the will to succeed?
Best,
Jeffrey